Service

Mechanical Integrity

Mechanical integrity programs that keep containment and safeguards fit for service, aligned with recognized engineering practices.

What mechanical integrity covers

Mechanical integrity (MI) is the set of activities that keeps process equipment and safeguards fit for service: designed and installed correctly, inspected and tested at the right intervals, and repaired before deficiencies lead to a loss of containment or a failed safeguard.

Under OSHA PSM (29 CFR 1910.119(j)), MI applies to pressure vessels and storage tanks, piping systems and their components, relief and vent systems and devices, emergency shutdown systems, controls (including monitoring devices, sensors, alarms and interlocks) and pumps. In practice, an effective program also covers every safeguard credited in PHA and LOPA studies.

Building blocks of an MI program

  1. Equipment identification

    A complete, maintained list of covered equipment and safety-critical devices, linked to PSI and PHA safeguards.

  2. Inspection, testing and preventive maintenance (ITPM)

    Tasks, methods and intervals for each equipment type, justified by RAGAGEP, manufacturer guidance and operating experience.

  3. Written procedures

    Procedures for ITPM tasks and for repair and alteration, so work is done consistently.

  4. Training

    Maintenance personnel trained in the process hazards and the procedures applicable to their tasks.

  5. Deficiency management

    Defined acceptance criteria and a process to correct deficiencies before further use, or in a safe and timely manner with documented interim measures.

  6. Quality assurance

    Checks that new equipment, spare parts and materials are suitable for the application and installed correctly.

  7. Records and performance

    Inspection and test documentation, trending and metrics such as overdue tasks and repeat failures.

Recognized and generally accepted good engineering practice

PSM requires inspection and testing to follow RAGAGEP. Commonly applied documents include:

EquipmentExamples of applicable practices
Pressure vesselsAPI 510; National Board Inspection Code
Process pipingAPI 570; ASME B31.3 for design
Atmospheric storage tanksAPI 653; STI SP001 for shop-fabricated tanks
Risk-based inspectionAPI RP 580 and API RP 581
Relief devicesAPI RP 576; NBIC
Safety instrumented systemsANSI/ISA-61511
Ammonia refrigerationANSI/IIAR standards, including IIAR 6 for inspection, testing and maintenance

How we help

  • MI program gap assessments against PSM and RAGAGEP
  • Covered-equipment lists and safeguard (IPL) registers
  • ITPM plans and interval justification
  • MI procedures, deficiency management and QA processes
  • Integration of PHA, LOPA and SIS outputs into the MI program
  • MI performance metrics and management review

Scope note

Program engineering, not field inspection

Our mechanical integrity services focus on program design, technical assessment and engineering review. Where field inspection, nondestructive examination or certified inspector services are required, we can help you define the scope and work with qualified inspection providers.

Frequently asked questions

How are inspection intervals determined?

From applicable codes and standards, manufacturer recommendations, damage mechanisms, the consequence of failure and the facility's own experience. Risk-based inspection (API RP 580/581) is one structured way to set and justify intervals.

Can equipment with a known deficiency stay in service?

PSM requires deficiencies outside acceptable limits to be corrected before further use, or in a safe and timely manner when necessary means are taken to assure safe operation. That decision should be documented with an engineering assessment and interim measures.

Make your MI program defensible

We can assess your current program, fill specific gaps or help build one for a newly covered process.